Effect of different light-curing techniques on hardness of a microhybrid dental composite resin / Efeito de diferentes técnicas de fotoativação na dureza de uma resina composta dental microhíbrida

Objective: This study assessed the Vickers hardness (VHN) provided by two LCUs when using (1) direct and indirect light-curing techniques, (2) 40 and 60 s and (3) top and bottom surfaces. Material & Methods: One halogen Curing Light 2500 (3M Espe) and one LED (MM Optics) were used by direct and indirect (0,1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 mm of dental structure) techniques during 40 and 60 s. The samples were made with FiltekTM Z250 in a metallic mould with a central orifice (4 mm in diameter, 2 mm in thickness). The samples were stored in dry mean by ± 24 h and the hardness measurements were performed in a testing machine (Buehler MMT-3 digital microhardness tester Lake Bluff, Illinois USA). A 50 gf load was used and the indenter with a dwell time of 30 s. The data were submitted to multiple ANOVA and Newman-Keuls‘s test (p < 0.05). Results: Halogen LCU exhibited higher Vickers hardness values than LED mainly because of the power density used. Hardness values were influenced by LCUs, lightcuring techniques, irradiation times and surfaces. For both LCUs, hardness values were found to decrease with indirect light-curing technique, mainly for the bottom surface. Samples irradiated for 60 s exhibited higher hardness values when the halogen LCU was used. For 60 s, the VHN values were statistically significant greater than 40 s. Significant differences in top and bottom surfaces Vickers hardness number (VHN) values were observed among different LCUs used 40 and 60 s. Conclusion: The LCUs, lightcuring techniques, variations of irradiation times, and surfaces (top and bottom) influence the composite resin hardness.

Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou a dureza Vickers (VHN) em função de duas fontes de luz quando utilizadas diferentes (1) técnicas de fotoativação, direta e indireta, (2) 40 e 60 s, e (3) superfícies de topo e base. Material e Métodos: Uma fonte de luz halógena Curing Light 2500 (3M Espe) e um LED (MM Optics) foram utilizados nas técnicas de fotoativação direta e indireta (0 , 1,0, 2,0 e 3,0 milímetros de estrutura dental), durante 40 e 60 s. As amostras foram feitas utilizando-se FiltekTM Z250 em matriz metálica com orifício central (4 mm de diâmetro, com 2 mm de espessura). As amostras foram armazenadas em meio seco por ± 24 h e as medidas de dureza foram realizadas em microdurômetro (Buehler MMT-3 digital microhardness tester Lake Bluff, Illinois USA). Uma carga de 50 gf durante 30 s foi utilizada. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância múltipla e teste de Newman-Keuls (p < 0,05). Resultados: A fonte de luz halógena promoveu os maiores valores de dureza Vickers, principalmente, em função da densidade de potência utilizada. Os valores de dureza foram influenciados pelas fontes de luz, técnicas de fotoativação, tempos de irradiação e superfícies, topo e base. Para ambas as fontes de luz, os valores de dureza diminuíram com a técnica de fotoativação indireta, principalmente para a superfície de base. Amostras irradiadas por 60 s apresentaram valores de dureza maiores quando a fonte de luz halógena foi utilizada. Durante 60 s , os valores de VHN foram estatisticamente significativos maior do que 40 s. Diferenças significativas foram observadas nos valores dureza Vickers (VHN) para as superfícies de topo e base utilizando 40 e 60 s. Conclusão: As fontes de luz, técnicas de fotoativação direta e indireta, tempos de irradiação e superfícies (topo e base) influenciam na dureza da resina composta.

Influence of adhesion promoters and curing-light sources on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Context: The effect of different curing units on bond strength of orthodontic brackets is still unclear when utilizing nanofilled composites in comparison with traditional Transbond-XT. Aim: To evaluate the influence of two adhesive promoters and two curing-light units on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets. Settings and Design: The factors under study were adhesive promoters (nanofilled composite - Filtek-Z350 flowable restorative and conventional orthodontic adhesive - Transbond XT) and curing-light units (halogen lamp - Ultralux and LED device - Radii-Call). Material and Methods: Forty lower bovine incisors were utilized. The teeth were distributed in four groups (n = 10) according to the combination between adhesive promoters and curing-light units. Scotchbond Multipurpose-Plus and Transbond-XT primer were used to bond Filtek-Z350 Flowable Restorative and Transbond-XT, respectively. After storage in distilled water for 24 h, the brackets were subjected to SBS test at a speed of 0.5 mm/min until bracket debonding. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was assigned at fractured specimens. Statistical analysis used: Analysis of variance and Tukey test were utilized. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare ARI scores between the groups (p<0.05). Results: There was statistically significant difference between the adhesive promoters tested. Transbond-XT showed higher SBS means than Filtek-Z350. There was no statistically significant difference between both curing-light units tested in this study, neither between ARI scores. Conclusions: The conventional orthodontic adhesive presented higher bond strength than the nanofilled composite, although both materials interacted similarly to the teeth. The curing-light devices tested did not influence on bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Time Saving Method In Curing Light Cure Composite While Orthodontic Bracket Placement.

The placement of brackets precisely in clinical situations cured by light cured techniques is time consuming. This special technique describes an innovative idea of reducing the curing time and saving the clinical hours for placement of brackets.

In vitro study on the influence of the light polymerization technique and appliance on the bond strength of intra-radicular posts / Estudo in vitro da influência da técnica e do aparelho de fotopolimerização sobre a resistência de união de pinos intra-radiculares

The purpose of this study is to verify the influence of light curing type on retention force of direct technique and direct-indirect technique.Forty bovine single root teeth with 12mm length were used in this study. Roots were endodontically treated and randomly divided into four groups according to the light curing unit and the technique used: group HD (direct technique, halogen lamp), group LD (direct technique, LED), group HI (direct-indirect technique, halogen lamp), group LI (direct-indirect technique, LED). Retention force was determined using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron). All data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test. After the test, failure was examined and classified according to the fracture place: post/ resin; resin/dentin; mix. Group HI (246.05N ± 29.51) and LI (241.60N ± 28.95) did not show difference statistically but presented higher retention force than group HD (142.30N ± 25.60) and LD (178.56N ± 25.67). Most of fracture occurred in interface between dentin/resin. Based on the obtained results, it was concluded that adhesive cementation technique influenced in the retention of glass fiber post

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência do tipo de luz sobre força de adesão de pinos feitos pela técnica direta ou indireta. Quarenta dentes bovinos unirradiculares com 12 milímetros de comprimento foram utilizadas neste estudo. As raízes foram tratadas endodonticamente e divididas aleatoriamente em quatro grupos de acordo com a unidade de fotoativação e técnica utilizada: grupo 1 (técnica direta, lâmpada halógena), grupo 2 (técnica direta, LED), grupo 3 (técnica direta indireta, lâmpada halógena ), grupo 4 (técnica direta indireta, LED). A força de retenção foi determinada utilizando-se uma máquina universal de ensaios (Instron). Todos os dados foram analisados pela análise de variância (ANOVA) e teste de Tukey. Após o teste, as falhas foram analisadas e classificadas de acordo com o local de fratura: pino / resina; resina / dentina ou mista. Os Grupos 3 (246,05 N ± 29,51) e 4 (241,60 N ± 28,95) não apresentaram diferenças estatísticas entre si, mas apresentou maior força de retenção que os grupos 1 (142,30 N ± 25, 60) e 2 (178,56 ± 25,67 N). A maioria das fraturas ocorreu na interface entre a dentina / resina. Com base nos resultados obtidos, concluiu-se que a técnica de cimentação adesiva influenciou na retenção dos pinos de fibra de vidro

Degree of conversion of adhesive systems light-cured by LED and halogen light

This study evaluated the effect of blue light emitting diode (LED) and quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) on the degree of conversion (DC) of an etch-and-rinse Single Bond adhesive system (SB) and a mixture composed of primer solution and resin bond from Clearfil SE Bond self-etching adhesive system (CB) using Fourier transform infrared analysis (FTIR). Adhesives were applied to potassium bromide pellet surfaces and FTIR analyses were performed before and after photo-activation for 10 s with either LED (Freelight 1 - 400 mw/cm²) or QTH (XL 3000 - 630 mw/cm²) light-curing units (n=8). Additional FTIR spectra were obtained from photo-activated samples stored in distilled water for 1 week. The DC was calculated by comparing the spectra obtained from adhesive resins before and after photo-activation. The results were analyzed by two-way split-plot ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Both adhesive systems exhibited low DC ( percent) immediately after photo-activation (SB/QTH: 18.7 ± 3.9; SB/LED: 13.5 ± 3.3; CF/QTH: 13.6 ± 1.9; CF/LED: 6.1 ± 1.0). The DC of samples light-cured with LED was lower than DC of those light-cured with QTH, immediately after light curing and after 1 week (SB/QTH: 51.3 ± 6.6; SB/LED: 50.3 ± 4.8; CF/QTH: 56.5 ± 2.9; CF/LED: 49.2 ± 4.9). The LED curing unit used to photo-activate the adhesive resins promoted lower DC than the QTH curing unit both immediately after light curing and 1 week after storage in water.

Este estudo avaliou a influência de sistemas de fotoativação no grau de conversão (GC) de sistemas adesivos por meio da análise infravermelha transformada de Fourier (FTIR). Os sistemas adesivos Single Bond (SB) e Clearfil SE Bond (CF) foram aplicados em pastilhas de brometo de potássio e fotoativados com luz halógena (XL 3000 - 630 mw/cm²) (QTH) e LED (Elipar Freelight 1 - 400 mw/cm²) por 10 s (n=8). Foram obtidos espectros de FTIR antes e imediatamente após a fotoativação, e tambem após 1 semana de armazenamento em água destilada. Calculou-se o GC comparando-se a razão entre os picos das bandas dos espectros, antes e após a fotoativação. Os resultados de GC foram submetidos à ANOVA e ao teste de Tukey (p<0,05). Para ambos os sistemas adesivos, o GC ( por cento) obtido imediatamente após a fotoativação com LED foi inferior ao obtido utilizando-se QTH (SB/QTH: 18,7 ± 3,9; SB/LED: 13,5 ± 3,3; CF/QTH: 13,6 ± 1,9; CF/LED: 6,1 ± 1,0). Após uma semana foi observado um aumento significativo no GC de todos os grupos, porém os valores dos grupos fotoativados com LED mantiveram-se inferiores aos obtidos com QTH (SB/QTH: 51,3 ± 6,6; SB/LED: 50,3 ± 4,8; CF/QTH: 56,5 ± 2,9; CF/LED: 49,2 ± 4,9). O GC dos adesivos fotoativados com LED foi inferior ao observado após fotoativação com QTH, imediatamente após fotoativação como após 1 semana de armazenamento em água.

Photodynamic Therapy of Actinic Keratoses Using 585nm Dye Laser and Variable Lights / 대한피부과학회지

BACKGROUND: Incohorenet lamps or pulsed/continuous wave lasers have effectively been used for photodynamic therapy (PDT). OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of the various light sources, such as halogen, xenon arc, and the 585nm pulsed dye laser, in photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratosis. METHODS: PDT, using 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA), was used on 18 patients who had been diagnosed with actinic keratoses. A single treatment consisting of a topical application of 20% 5-aminolaevulinic acid for 4 hours, followed by halogen, xenon arch lamp and the 585nm pulsed dye laser was administered. RESULTS: Of the 227 lesions, 95/106 (89.6%), 68/77 (88.3%), and 39/44 (88.6%) lesions showed complete response to the halogen lamp, xenon arc lamp, and 595nm dye laser respectively, and 10/106 (9.4%), 9/77 (11.7%), and 5/44 (11.4%) lesions showed partial response to the above, respectively. Only one lesion (1.0%) showed no response to the halogen lamp. In all cases, cosmetic outcome was excellent, and anatomical function was preserved. Topical 5-ALA based PDT is an effective and useful treatment modality for various premalignant diseases, to the halogen lamp, xenon arc lamp, or 585nm pulsed dye laser were used. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of actinic keratosis with various light sources, following topical application of 5-ALA is effective. However, advantages of the laser treatment may include recovery times, excellent postreatment cosmesis, and high efficacy rate.